«

»

Jan 27 2008

Print this Post

HARVARD VS. YALE GAME AND THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARIES

HARVARD VS. YALE GAME AND THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARIES
1/27/08

I wish I could take the credit for this insightful observation, that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are the Ivy League players in the Democratic Presidential Primaries Bowl Game. My radio , television, and life co-host, Leila , has always been an astute observer of presidential politics . When she heard that Barack Obama met his wife, while they were attending Harvard Law School she immediately made the connection of the Harvard Yale Bowl Game and the historical rivalry between both liberal elitist colleges. Bill and Hillary Clinton met, when both were attending Yale Law School.

When Leila told me of this connection the entire Obama, Clinton rivalry all became clear to me. It is common knowledge that Yale has produced the last three consecutive presidents. Also that Yale graduates (Skull and Bones) were the founders of the CIA, and have been the directors of every important U.S Government agency since the early 1940’s. Prior to that time Harvard produced the majority of presidential candidates. The last Harvard graduate to become president was John F. Kennedy. G.W Bush received his MBA from Harvard , but he graduated by the seat of his pants and his father’s influence. His real loyalties were with Yale, where he had the inherited honor of being the President of the Skull and Bones fraternity a position once held by his father, and grandfather. The last Harvard graduates who became presidential and vice presidential candidates were Ralph Nader, and his running mate Winona LaDuke, in the 2000 presidential elections. They ran as Independents both were too liberal, and too non elitist to be a part of the Democratic Party. They wanted nothing to do with the Democratic Party. Ralph Nader was of Lebanese decent, and Winona LaDuke was an American Indian both liberal activists, who made serious attacks against the “tweedle dee, tweedle dum” Republican and Democratic candidates. Nader and LaDuke gained millions of supporters, ( I was one of them) by exposing the corrupt elitism of the bogus, two party , political system.

The majority of Americans are not aware of , nor will they believe, that they are totally manipulated by the elitists in their country. Conservative talk radio, or liberal talk radio, conservative and liberal magazines , and newspaper publishers, and executives of the conservative media are liberal elitists . They are globalist’s of the highest order, and own or sit on the board of directors of liberal and conservative publications and media companies. The American public fails time and again to understand that; the Hegelian , Marxist concept of Divide and Conquer is the ultimate globalist method of mass manipulation pitting one political party against another,one group of idealists against another, and funding and promoting both parties. By creating this bipolar national personality, they can easily manipulate the theft of American treasure and plunder the natural resources. This is done by their funding campaigns of congressmen, senators and presidents, who all swear loyalty to their largest financial supporters. If anyone takes the time to investigate the real supporters of liberal and conservative political parties, and activist groups world wide; they will be amazed to discover the same people, foundations, and corporations, are behind them all. A prime example of this is William F.Buckley Jr. founder of the (so called) conservative movement in the United States, and publisher of the National Review. In a public debate with noted liberal Howard Zinn, Howard Zinn accused Buckley of being a liberal. He stated in the debate, that Buckley’s conservativism was nothing more than a phoney disguise. William F. Buckley Jr. was a CIA operative for many years and perhaps still is . He is a Yale graduate, and a member of the most liberally , globalist, elitist group in existence in the United States The Council on Foreign Relations. Most of Buckley’s associates are as well. The National Review has never shown a profit as a magazine, but has shown staggering multimillion dollar losses. It has never been adequately explained by Buckley, or others at the National Review how the magazine has been able to continue to sustain multi million dollar losses through out it’s history and still remain in business.

Another example of the elitists’ cynicsm behind U.S Presidential politics is the former ambassador of Iraq, and a celebrity in the ” Plame Gate” scandel, Joe Wilson. Joe Wilson was known for his family’s Republican leanings. He openly gave a $2000 dollar donation to Al Gore’s campaign and hedged his bet with a $1000 donation to George W. Bush’s campaign . His wife Valerie Plame Wilson was a CIA operative outed by the Bush Administration because of her husband’s discrediting of the Bush statement of a Niger Yellowcake connection, and Saddam Hussein. The Wilsons’ troubles began when they tried to be honest and expose the lies of the Bush Administration leading up to the Iraq invasion. It didn’t do anyone any good, especially Scooter Libby. The U.S is still in Iraq, spent 650 billion dollars, and so far lost 4000 American lives. The Republican candidate receiving the most publicity lately is John McCain,who has stated; that he supports the war and American presense in Iraq may last one hundred years. I haven’t checked lately at McCains list of donors, but I wouldn’t be too surpized if Joe Wilson was one of them hedging his bet again, hoping for another political appointment if McCain becomes president. He may be offered the Ambassadorship to Iraq by either a new Democrat or Republican president, since no one wants the job.

It is all an elitist game for power. The herding of the American middle classes to the polls is merely for elitist fun and profit. Who makes the money in these campaigns? The media, the candidates, the winner, and his or her big financial backers and loyalists all win . Who receives the prestige, financial benefits, and endowments if their University is associated with the education of a president Yale or Harvard? Which university’s alumni receive special attention in government appointments and awarding of government contracts, the alumni of the winning candidate or the loser? It’s not hard to answer that question.

As a graduate of a state university I have no fidelity or association with the Ivy League, or to Yale, or Harvard. I am like everyone else, who is excluded from the private Yale vs. Harvard elitist’s tale gate parties. However, regardless of how apparent or not the connection may be the fact remains that Hillary Clinton , and Barack Obama do represent and are members of the exclusive Ivy League alumni. They are elitists, they are powerful, they are backed by people with the same ideals, and the same principles, or lack of principles, the same breeding and inbreeding. Regardless who the herded American public votes for as the Democratic candidate the average voter is never the winner in a presidential election, even if he or she votes for the winning candidate. The winners in presidential elections are those, who love watching the game, laugh the heartiest at it, have the best tail gate parties, and have a large bet on the winning team.

L.A. STEEL

Permanent link to this article: http://lasteelshow.org/main/?p=1360

[adsense]